[HTML][HTML] Re:“Moving forward after two deaths in a gene therapy trial of myotubular myopathy” by Wilson and Flotte

PB Shieh, CG Bönnemann, W Müller-Felber… - Human gene …, 2020 - liebertpub.com
PB Shieh, CG Bönnemann, W Müller-Felber, A Blaschek, JJ Dowling, NL Kuntz, AM Seferian
Human gene therapy, 2020liebertpub.com
Dear Editor, IN RESPONSE TO THE RECENT EDITORIAL,''Moving Forward After Two
Deaths in a Gene Therapy Trial of Myotubular Myopathy,''and as investigators for the
ASPIRO study in children with X-linked myotubular myopathy (XLMTM), we want to clarify
discrepancies in the information provided and emphasize several points. We do so in the
spirit of transparency for the scientific community that continues to pursue gene therapies to
safely improve the lives of patients. ASPIRO is a first-in-human study of intravenously …
Dear Editor, IN RESPONSE TO THE RECENT EDITORIAL,‘‘Moving Forward After Two Deaths in a Gene Therapy Trial of Myotubular Myopathy,’’and as investigators for the ASPIRO study in children with X-linked myotubular myopathy (XLMTM), we want to clarify discrepancies in the information provided and emphasize several points. We do so in the spirit of transparency for the scientific community that continues to pursue gene therapies to safely improve the lives of patients. ASPIRO is a first-in-human study of intravenously administered AT132, an investigational therapeutic MTM1 (myotubularin) gene transfer using a recombinant AAV8 vector for enhanced muscle transduction and a muscle-specific promoter for tissue-restricted expression. Preclinical studies of AT132 were conducted by Audentes in two animal models of XLMTM (MTM1 knockout mouse and a naturally occurring missense-mutated canine) and in wild-type nonhuman primates (NHPs). These studies showed that doses of AT132 up to 8× 1014 vg/kg (vector genomes per kg) were well tolerated in NHPs with no adverse findings related to AT132 exposure (unpublished data). Doses for the ASPIRO ascending-dose clinical trial were informed by efficacy and safety observations from those carefully designed animal experiments. Importantly, the hepatotoxicity observed in three boys who received the 3× 1014 vg/kg dose in ASPIRO was not observed in the XLMTM animals and in NHPs that received 8× 1014 vg/kg. To date, 17 boys have received AT132 at 3× 1014 vg/kg, in the initial dose escalation cohort of ASPIRO or in a later expansion cohort, which proceeded after careful assessment of prior dosed patients, including by an independent monitoring committee. Two of the 17 boys who received AT132 at the 3× 1014 vg/kg dose experienced fatal liver dysfunction and one has ongoing severe liver dysfunction. These three boys, who were in the later expansion cohort, shared several notable features: they were older, heavier (and thus received among the highest total vg, range: 4.80× 1015–7.74× 1015 total vg), and all had evidence of likely pre-existing intrahepatic cholestasis. Although the two deaths occurred months after dosing, all three boys demonstrated signs of liver dysfunction within 3–4 weeks after receiving AT132. Although the pathomechanism is not yet characterized, hepatobiliary disease is observed in the XLMTM population. 1–3 After treatment with AT132, liver findings in these three boys included intrahepatocellular and canalicular cholestasis, periportal and bile ductular reaction, secondary fibrosis, and notable lack of prominent liver parenchymal inflammatory cellular infiltrates. More than 50% of subjects in the ASPIRO trial have some evidence of pre-existing hepatobiliary disease—including intermittent direct hyperbilirubinemia, intermittent transaminase elevation, and/or historical cholestasis or jaundice—yet no similar, treatment-related, serious cholestatic liver dysfunction has been observed in the six patients in the 1× 1014 vg/kg cohort or in any of the younger, lighter patients in the 3× 1014 vg/kg cohort regardless of pre-existing hepatobiliary disease. It is important to evaluate whether immune mechanisms may have contributed to the severe liver dysfunction observed, particularly in light of what has been published for adeno-associated virus-mediated gene therapy across varying serotypes and dose levels, including in preclinical settings. However, full investigations of these events are ongoing, and it is premature to draw definitive conclusions at this time. We have observed favorable efficacy data for gene transfer therapy in murine and canine XLMTM, with neither …
Mary Ann Liebert