Induction of DC‐STAMP by alternative activation and downstream signaling mechanisms

M Yagi, K Ninomiya, N Fujita, T Suzuki… - Journal of Bone and …, 2007 - academic.oup.com
M Yagi, K Ninomiya, N Fujita, T Suzuki, R Iwasaki, K Morita, N Hosogane, K Matsuo
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, 2007academic.oup.com
DC‐STAMP is essential for fusion of osteoclasts and foreign body giant cells; however, it is
not known whether dc‐stamp expression in these two cell types is differentially regulated.
Here, we show that dc‐stamp expression and cell–cell fusion are regulated in a cell type–
specific manner. Introduction: The transcription factors c‐Fos and NFATc1 cooperate to
regulate osteoclast differentiation, whereas PU. 1 and NF‐κB are activated in macrophages
and osteoclasts or in both cell types. Thus, we asked what role c‐Fos, NFATc1, PU. 1, and …
Abstract
DC‐STAMP is essential for fusion of osteoclasts and foreign body giant cells; however, it is not known whether dcstamp expression in these two cell types is differentially regulated. Here, we show that dcstamp expression and cell–cell fusion are regulated in a cell type–specific manner.
Introduction: The transcription factors c‐Fos and NFATc1 cooperate to regulate osteoclast differentiation, whereas PU.1 and NF‐κB are activated in macrophages and osteoclasts or in both cell types. Thus, we asked what role c‐Fos, NFATc1, PU.1, and NF‐κB played in regulating dendritic cell–specific transmembrane protein (dcstamp) expression and fusion of osteoclasts and macrophage giant cells.
Materials and Methods: Transcriptional activation by c‐Fos and NFATc1 was examined by dcstamp promoter analysis. Multinuclear cell formation was analyzed in cells from c‐Fos–deficient mice or in wildtype cells treated with the NFAT inhibitor FK506. The role of DC‐STAMP in cell fusion was examined in vitro in a macrophage giant cell formation assay using DC‐STAMP–deficient cells. Recruitment of c‐Fos, NFATc1, PU.1, and NF‐κB to the dcstamp promoter in osteoclasts and macrophage giant cells was analyzed by chromatin‐immunoprecipitation analysis.
Results: Both activator protein‐1 (AP‐1) and NFAT binding sites in the dcstamp promoter were needed for dcstamp expression after RANKL stimulation of osteoclasts. dcstamp expression was induced in osteoclasts and macrophage giant cells, and cells from DC‐STAMP–deficient mice failed to form either multinuclear osteoclasts or macrophage giant cells. In contrast, c‐Fos is indispensable for dcstamp expression and cell–cell fusion under conditions favoring in vitro and in vivo induction of osteoclasts but not macrophage giant cells. Consistently, an NFAT inhibitor suppressed multinuclear osteoclast formation but not macrophage giant cell formation. In addition, PU.1 and NF‐κB binding sites were detected in the dcstamp promoter, and both PU.1 and NF‐κB were recruited to the dcstamp promoter after granulocyte‐macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM‐CSF) + interleukin (IL)‐4 stimulation.
Conclusions: dcstamp expression is regulated differently in osteoclasts and macrophage giant cells. c‐Fos and NFATc1, both of which are essential for osteoclast differentiation, are needed for dcstamp expression and cell–cell fusion in osteoclasts, but both factors are dispensable for giant cell formation by macrophages. Because PU.1 and NF‐κB are recruited to the dcstamp promoter after stimulation with GM‐CSF + IL‐4, dcstamp transcription is regulated in a cell type–specific manner.
Oxford University Press